Research article critique

The discussion included in this article is very interesting, particularly to the non-Chinese reader.Qualitative research article critique - Proofreading and proofediting aid from best specialists.They link the evolution of professional ethics to reform and the working conditions of nurses within China, with specific reference to values (Pang et al, 2009, p. 312). This author would argue that it would have been better to perhaps provide more detail here so that the reader could better understand Chinese culture and politics.For the purposes of this essay, the primary tool used is that proposed by Cormack (2000), but the author will make reference to other critiquing guides and information, including the popular CASP tool (PHRU, 2009, online).We understand that sometimes it is difficult to manage your time and find the opportunity to get all assignments done just in time.The authors do not, however, present the hypothesis in the abstract (Cormack, 2000).

Critical Review of a research paper - On-line Web Courses

Product Description RES 724 WEEK 6 Research Design Critique RES 724 WEEK 6 Research Design Critique.Use your outline of opinions to write several paragraphs explaining how well the author addressed the topic.However, this author would also conclude that because of some methodological and reporting weaknesses in this study, it would be better to find other research confirming these findings before using it as evidence for practice.Your critique of the article will be based on proof and your own thoughtful reasoning.As these are vulnerable adults attending clinics for their chronic condition, not discussion how the data was collected from them is a serious failing and may also constitute an ethical issue.

As the title of the article suggests, cultural synchronization between the teacher and the students can be influential in.It does not clearly indicate the research approach used (Cormack, 2000).Begin by looking at the title, abstract, introduction, headings, opening sentences of each paragraph, and the conclusion.Limitations of the study are described and discussed in a separate section, but there is not really much explicit evaluation of the implications for practice.Its weakness may be that it does not offer any new information or solutions.It presents some of the issues in relation to culture and ideology.

Cormack (2000) asks whether the discussion is balanced, and reading this, there does appear to be a balanced evaluation, especially of conflicts between Chinese or personal ideologies, and professional ideologies.

How to Write an Article Review |

To the less research-aware reader, it would be difficult to divine this information from the title alone, and it could be argued that it would be better to include in this title a clearer indication of the nature of the study.Remember, this is not where you say if you liked the article or not.However, they further state that the participants were allocated to either method according to their interests.Sandelowski (2009 p. 77 states that using qualitative description as a distinctive research methodology in its own right is erroneous.Because the concept of professional values is relatively new in China, there is limited research to guide professional development. (Pang et al, 2009, p. 312).

Community Dashboard Random Article About Us Categories Recent Changes.The results of this study are presented in tables, diagrams, and in great detail within the text of the paper.The title is concise (Cormack, 2000) and describes the focus of the research itself.CRITIQUE ON A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ARTICLE A qualitative study of nursing student experiences of clinical Practice.The title is concise: Nursing values in China: the expectations of registered nurses. (Pang et al, 2009, p. 312). As such, it informs the reader of the focus of the study, and its subject matter.The reporting of the study does not provide enough transparency to allow this author to evaluate its methodological rigour, as there is no exploration of any of the above concepts, and no evidence that the authors of the study have attempted to justify their approach or evaluate the pros and cons of their methodological framework.Express your opinion about whether the article was a clear, thorough, and useful explanation of the subject.However, this author would argue that more detail could have been included here for even greater clarity, and there could have been some explanation of the justification for this methodological approach, showing the provenance of this type of analytical process, as well as usefulness of the measures used to promote rigour.The level of specialist statistical knowledge required to understand this would be significant.

They include the results and a summary of conclusions from these findings.However, there is no explanation of what information was given to the participants, how informed consent was achieved, or if there was any issue with communication or accessibility for people with different communication needs.If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please click on the link below to request removal.You can focus on the theoretical approach, the content, the presentation or interpretation of evidence, or the style.Our specialists provide professional assistance for writing article critiques on any topic.Find journal articles, etc. quickly by using a research database linked below.In particular, it does indicate clearly that it is a quantitative paper which uses recognisable data collection tools.

Think about what the author does well, good points she makes, and insightful observations.For example, you might address a particular strength in the first sentence of the opinion section, followed by several sentences elaborating on the significance of the point.However, the implications for practice are presented in a separate section.

The quality of this study seems to rest in the choice of a quantitative approach, and the choice of data collection instruments.The purpose of this study was to examine the causal relationships between age, antiretroviral treatment, social support, symptom experience, self-care strategies, and the HRQL in Thai PLWHA ((Tangkawanich et al, 2008 p. 217). The nature of this statement would suggest that it is not an experimental study, but that it is within a quantitative research paradigm.Visit our order page and place the order online by providing us with all necessary details regarding your paperwork.However, the only recommendation for future research is that it should be longitudinal rather than cross-sectional (Tangkawanich et al, 2008 p. 217).The introduction of the article review will have the identification sentence.

A critique of an article is the objective analysis of a literary or scientific piece, with emphasis on whether or not the.More transparency could have been achieved by including an explanation of these tests.They have used the Social Support Questionniare, the Symptom Experience Questionnaire, the Self-Care Strategies Questionnaire, and the Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (Tangkawanich et al, 2008 p. 217). These are described in detail, and where they are based on previously developed research or derived directly from previous studies, this is also described.Victims who have been sexually assaulted were more probable to participate in.

However, a strength of this study could be considered to be the use of multiple data collection instruments, and the detail with which they are described, and their provenance accounted for.This could be considered a limitation in the reporting of this research.

Qualitative research article critique - Select Expert

This review has highlighted the relevance of this article to wider nursing theories and concepts, and has shed light on the values possessed by Chinese nurses which appear to be similar to those of other nurses.This could be considered a weakness of this studys reporting.

Essays - largest database of quality sample essays and research papers on Sample Research Critique.It is published in a reputable, peer-reviewed publication, which would suggest that it is likely to be of sufficient quality to warrant a full critique.We can write article critiques for any article from any source whether it is a newspaper, a website, a magazine or a scientific journal.Do: give an overall impression of the article using the third person and a formal, academic style.The chosen article is Pang et al (2009, p. 312), a study of professional values of Chinese nurses, published in the journal Nursing and Health Sciences.